Skip to main content

Rishabh Gupta

Engineering SystemsFor The AI Era

Platform Engineering · SRE · Data Platforms · AI Infrastructure

Systems-minded engineering across platform, operations, cloud, data and AI infrastructure with an emphasis on evidence, architecture and production reality.

View Resume

Profile, flagship systems, selected case studies, resume and verified contact paths.

Platform engineeringSRE and production operations

Engineering Core · conceptual domains

Platform

Kubernetes · Docker · Podman · Nginx · Jenkins · Linux

Platform: Building and operating internal engineering platforms that support reliable application, data and operations workloads.

01

Profile

Building, Operating And Explaining Complex Systems

The portfolio is positioned around platform, reliability, cloud, data and AI infrastructure work rather than a generic full-stack narrative.

Technology and data platform engineer with 10+ years of experience designing, integrating and operating enterprise applications, cloud infrastructure, data platforms, AI-enabled solutions and production services.

Core areas

Platform EngineeringSREDevOpsCloud InfrastructureData EngineeringData Platform EngineeringMLOpsAI InfrastructureSoftware ArchitectureObservabilityDatabase EngineeringAutomationDistributed Systems

Current focus

  • • Databricks architecture, Spark optimization and Delta workloads
  • • Operational tooling for complex production workflows
  • • Agentic AI, RAG and enterprise MCP-integrated support systems
  • • Observability-driven engineering and incident analysis
  • • System design tradeoffs across reliability, cost and speed

Principles

• Keep critical paths observable.

• Treat operations as a product surface.

• Prefer reversible architecture decisions.

• Separate production evidence from experiments.

Technical direction

AI Runtime Control Planes

How retrieval, tools, policies and observability can be composed into safe AI operating surfaces.

Data Observability

Making pipeline correctness and drift easier to reason about before downstream systems suffer.

Operational Product Design

Building internal tools that feel intentionally designed, fast and support-centered instead of purely administrative.

02

Operating posture

Experience Shaped Around Systems, Not Labels

The emphasis here is on the systems, domains and operational responsibilities that shape the work: platform ownership, data movement, observability, incident response and AI-adjacent infrastructure.

production

Platform And Reliability Operations

evidence-based

Technical ownership across the Databricks layer of the M3 platform, operational tooling, observability, Kafka integration, cloud automation and production reliability.

Responsibilities

  • • Serve as technical owner for the Databricks layer across 20+ Spark and Delta workloads.
  • • Translate business, operational, platform and data requirements into solution designs, data models and implementation plans.
  • • Lead incident investigation and root-cause analysis across Databricks, Spark, Kafka, databases, AWS infrastructure and applications.
  • • Provide technical leadership through design reviews, code reviews, prioritization, troubleshooting and mentoring.

Lessons

  • • Operational interfaces deserve the same architecture discipline as customer-facing systems.
  • • Reliability work is most effective when observability is built into the workflow itself.
DatabricksPySparkSpark SQLDelta LakeUnity CatalogPythonKafkaAWSTerraformKubernetesOpenSearchGrafanaInstanaServiceNow

production

Data Platform And Performance Engineering

evidence-based

Databricks, Spark, Delta Lake and MSSQL-oriented data engineering focused on throughput, validation, data quality and architectural tradeoffs in large-scale workloads.

Responsibilities

  • • Reason about throughput bottlenecks and data skew.
  • • Tune data writes, staging patterns and cluster sizing decisions.
  • • Keep cost, correctness and operational simplicity in balance.

Lessons

  • • Write-path design matters as much as compute-path design.
  • • Large-scale data scenarios need observability at every stage of the pipeline.
DatabricksSparkDelta LakeMSSQLJDBCSQL

research

AI Infrastructure And Engineering Lab Work

evidence-based

Exploring knowledge systems, local LLM tooling, embeddings, vector databases, MCP, RAG and agentic workflows as practical infrastructure problems connected to support and incident workflows.

Responsibilities

  • • Evaluate local and hosted AI building blocks.
  • • Design retrieval pipelines that stay inspectable and reproducible.
  • • Treat AI systems as infrastructure with failure modes, not just demos.

Lessons

  • • Retrieval quality depends on ingestion and evidence discipline, not model choice alone.
  • • Agent systems need strong guardrails around tools, data access and observability.
OllamaQdrantLangflowMCPRAGBedrock

production

Application Modernization And Infrastructure Migration

evidence-based

Modernization work across enterprise application and data platforms, including deployment automation, NGINX reverse-proxy design and infrastructure migration.

Responsibilities

  • • Collaborate with business, application, infrastructure and deployment teams.
  • • Translate requirements into implementation plans, ETL workflows and integration changes.
  • • Lead migration-related coordination across application, infrastructure, security and release dependencies.

Lessons

  • • Modernization succeeds when architecture and release dependencies are mapped explicitly.
Windows ServerAzureNGINXDeployment automation

production

SQL Server ETL And Reporting Engineering

evidence-based

SSIS ETL pipelines, SSRS reporting, SQL optimization and workload scheduling for enterprise data processing and reporting workloads.

Responsibilities

  • • Build SQL Server SSIS ETL pipelines and SSRS reporting solutions.
  • • Optimize SQL queries, stored procedures and indexes.
  • • Implement workload-scheduler flows with dependency management and failure handling.

Lessons

  • • ETL and reporting systems need the same operational discipline as applications.
SQL ServerSSISSSRSIBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler

production

Enterprise Application Support Engineering

evidence-based

Enterprise application support across backend development, deployments, integration support, defect resolution, SQL analysis and production troubleshooting.

Responsibilities

  • • Support enterprise applications through backend development and deployments.
  • • Investigate defects, integrations and SQL issues in production contexts.

Lessons

  • • Production support builds the instincts needed for later reliability and platform work.
Backend developmentSQLProduction troubleshooting

Compute

GPU

Storage

Monitoring

Operating model

The focus here is not a decorative career ladder. It is the progression from software delivery into systems thinking: runtime reliability, data movement, platform leverage, observability and AI-adjacent infrastructure.

System emphasis

Platform workflows
Operational reliability
Data movement
Observability
02A

Experience domains

Domain Expertise Mapped To Evidence

Domains are grouped by evidence and classification, not by self-scored skill percentages. Each one connects to real projects, case studies and technologies from the portfolio graph.

Selected domain

Platform Engineering

Building and operating internal engineering platforms that support reliable application, data and operations workloads.

Classification

PROFESSIONAL

Evidence

5

Related technologies

Kubernetes

Related projects

• M3 OPS

• SAM

Related case studies

• M3 Operations Platform

Related experience

• Platform And Reliability Operations

03

Case studies

Flagship Systems And Engineering Cases

The portfolio moves from flagship systems into progressively deeper case studies, tradeoffs and evidence instead of long project writeups up front.

Flagship system

M3 Operations Platform

Operational platform for health monitoring, data search, workflows and production support paths across data, search and observability surfaces.

M3 · conceptual system model

M3

Operational platform · Workflows · Support systems

Connected to: Data, Search, Observability, Operations

Selected node

M3 Operations Platform

Conceptual system model

Operational platform for health monitoring, data search, workflows and support operations.

PythonAWSAurora MySQLDocumentDBOpenSearchKafka

Evidence

• Operational tooling

• Health monitoring

• Data search

• Workflow execution

• Incident-adjacent support

Large-Scale Engineering Scenario5 evidence links

Data Platform Performance Scenario

A performance-engineering scenario centered on Databricks, Spark, staging design and MSSQL write patterns, including a scenario involving roughly 700M records.

System path · conceptual

Source systems feed DatabricksSpark handles partitioning, batching and parallelismStaging isolates write-path pressure
DatabricksSparkDelta LakeMSSQLJDBC
Engineering Lab / AI Exploration6 evidence links

AI Knowledge Base

An engineering-lab system for document ingestion, chunking, embeddings, vector retrieval and agent workflows using local and hosted AI tooling.

System path · conceptual

Document ingestion and chunking pipelineEmbedding layer for vector representationQdrant vector store and retriever
QdrantOllamaLangflowMCPRAG
Production Experience7 evidence links

Observability Platform

A connected view of application signals flowing through search, metrics and tracing systems into alerting and ticketing workflows.

System path · conceptual

Applications emit logs, metrics and tracesObservability systems collect and correlate signalsAlerting and ticketing convert evidence into action
OpenSearchGrafanaInstanaVictoriaMetricsCloudWatch
Production Experience7 evidence links

Kafka Event Streaming

Streaming-oriented thinking around Kafka, Kafka JDBC Sink and event-driven integration patterns where operational correctness matters as much as throughput.

System path · conceptual

Producers emit domain eventsKafka transports and buffers stream flowConsumers and sinks materialize state downstream
KafkaKafka JDBC SinkEvent-driven architectureDLQReplay
Production Experience4 evidence links

Claims Highway

A data-integration and reporting-oriented experience area focused on SQL Server tooling and modernization paths for established enterprise workflows.

System path · conceptual

Data movement and transformation pipelinesReporting surfaces on top of SQL Server data flowsModernization path from legacy-heavy patterns to maintainable engineering workflows
SSISSSRSSQL ServerEnterprise data pipelines
Production Experience4 evidence links

SAM

A modernization-oriented application surface where frontend, backend and architecture choices need to balance delivery speed with maintainability.

System path · conceptual

Frontend and backend separationModernization through architecture simplificationOperational thinking applied to application change risk
AngularNode.jsApplication modernizationArchitecture
Production Experience3 evidence links

Certificate Management / MHDR

An operations and SRE-oriented problem space around certificate lifecycle visibility, automation and production safety.

System path · conceptual

Lifecycle inventory and monitoringAlerting around renewal risk and expiry windowsAutomation for repetitive operational paths
SREAutomationMonitoringCertificate lifecycleReliability
03A

Case study library

Progressive Disclosure For Systems Work

Summaries stay compact on the page. Each case study opens into targeted views for architecture, evidence, decisions and lessons.

production

7 evidence links

M3 Operations Platform

Operational tooling for workflows, health monitoring, search, analytics, data updates and incident-adjacent support paths.

PythonFlaskFastAPIAWSAurora MySQL

research

5 evidence links

Large-Scale Data Platform Performance Engineering

Databricks and Spark write-path engineering for large-scale MSSQL delivery scenarios, including observed runs around 700M records and long-running write windows near 200 minutes for roughly 550M records.

DatabricksSparkDelta LakeMSSQLJDBC

research

6 evidence links

Local AI Knowledge System

A local-AI and retrieval-focused knowledge system spanning document ingestion, chunking, embeddings, vector search, retrieval and agent workflows.

OllamaQdrantLangflownomic-embed-textbge-m3

production

7 evidence links

Observability As An Engineering System

Logs, metrics, traces, alerting and incident workflows treated as one evidence pipeline instead of disconnected tools.

OpenSearchGrafanaInstanaVictoriaMetricsCloudWatch

production

4 evidence links

Event-Driven Data Integration

Kafka-oriented integration thinking around producers, consumers, JDBC sink behavior, replay and failure handling.

KafkaKafka JDBC SinkReplayIdempotencyDLQ

production

4 evidence links

Claims Highway Modernization

Enterprise data movement and reporting work across SQL Server, SSIS and SSRS with modernization constraints.

SQL ServerSSISSSRSEnterprise data pipelines

production

4 evidence links

Application Modernization And Architecture Cleanup

Angular and Node.js modernization work centered on delivery risk, architectural seams and operational clarity.

AngularNode.jsNGINXDeployment automationAzure

production

3 evidence links

Certificate Operations And Reliability

Certificate lifecycle visibility, monitoring and automation work framed as reliability engineering.

MonitoringAutomationReliabilityCertificate lifecycle
04

Engineering lab

Engineering Lab

Active experiments stay clearly separated from production work. The focus is on the question, the environment, the observed behavior and the next engineering move.

AI pipeline · engineering lab · conceptual system model

Qdrant

Vector store

Connected to: Embeddings, Retrieval

Engineering lab

Documents, chunking, embeddings, Qdrant, retrieval, LLM and MCP are shown as a controlled experiment path.

Embedding / Retrieval Experiment

Select Qdrant to inspect vector retrieval, clustering and tool-routed RAG flow.

Active / experimenting / learning

The lab focuses on AI infrastructure, data movement, MCP-based tool integration, observability patterns and operational product design. Every experiment is framed around system behavior, not hype.

Selected experiment

RAG Stack Comparisons

research

Question

Compare local and hosted retrieval setups without losing transparency.

Experiment

Evaluate chunking, embedding models and retriever behavior across a small knowledge-base workflow.

Result

The ingestion and chunking path proved more important than model switching alone.

Lesson

Retrieval quality is an engineering pipeline problem, not only an LLM choice.

Next

Add stronger citation and evaluation loops.

QdrantOllamanomic-embed-textbge-m3Langflow
05

How I think

Architecture Means Tradeoffs Made Explicit

These are not universal rules. They are the questions and tensions I expect to resolve when designing platform, data and AI-adjacent systems.

Decision surface

Reliability vs Cost

Infrastructure and data systems often need to balance resilience against platform spend and operational complexity.

Tradeoffs

  • • Extra redundancy increases safety but can hide inefficient design.
  • • Aggressive cost cuts can create brittle operational states.

When to use

  • • Increase reliability investment when the blast radius is large or recovery is slow.
  • • Optimize cost only after the main failure modes are understood.

Risks

  • • False savings from under-instrumented systems
  • • Expensive architectures that still lack recovery discipline

Questions I ask

  • • What fails first?
  • • How quickly can it be diagnosed?
  • • What is the cheapest safe shape?

Decision surface

Batch vs Streaming

Data systems rarely need streaming just because the tooling exists.

Tradeoffs

  • • Batch keeps operations simpler for many workloads.
  • • Streaming improves freshness but multiplies operational edges.

When to use

  • • Choose batch when bounded latency is acceptable and correctness dominates.
  • • Choose streaming when replay, lag and consumer behavior can be operated safely.

Risks

  • • Premature event complexity
  • • Slow batch systems that become invisible until they fail

Questions I ask

  • • How fresh must the data be?
  • • Who operates replays?
  • • What is the sink behavior under pressure?

Decision surface

Managed vs Self-Hosted

Platform teams constantly trade direct control against maintenance burden.

Tradeoffs

  • • Managed services reduce undifferentiated toil.
  • • Self-hosted systems can improve control, locality and customization.

When to use

  • • Prefer managed when the workload is standard and team attention is scarce.
  • • Prefer self-hosted when data boundaries, performance behavior or platform constraints require it.

Risks

  • • Operational sprawl
  • • Vendor lock-in without clear exit paths

Questions I ask

  • • What control is actually required?
  • • Who will operate the custom path?

Decision surface

Local AI vs Cloud AI

AI systems vary widely in privacy requirements, latency budgets and operational ergonomics.

Tradeoffs

  • • Local AI increases control and experimentation speed.
  • • Cloud AI improves managed availability and model breadth.

When to use

  • • Use local stacks when data control, offline work or experimentation matters most.
  • • Use cloud stacks when scale, managed services and integration speed matter more.

Risks

  • • Operational complexity on local stacks
  • • Opaque failure behavior and governance gaps on cloud stacks

Questions I ask

  • • What evidence needs to remain local?
  • • How do we observe retrieval and tool behavior?

Decision surface

Build vs Buy

Internal engineering products often sit on the border between platform reuse and custom workflow value.

Tradeoffs

  • • Buying reduces time to first capability.
  • • Building can align the system to operational reality.

When to use

  • • Buy when the workflow is standard and integration is straightforward.
  • • Build when the operational model itself is the differentiator.

Risks

  • • Custom systems with weak ownership
  • • Bought systems that operators bypass because they do not fit

Questions I ask

  • • What is truly custom here?
  • • What would operators still do manually after the purchase?
06

Knowledge graph

Technologies Connected By Evidence

Every technology is derived from the same experience, project, case-study, experiment and lesson graph. Only real relationships are shown.

Observability · conceptual system model

Logs

Event evidence

Connected to: Application, Database, Kafka, OpenSearch

Signal paths

Select logs, metrics or traces to inspect how signals move into OpenSearch, Grafana, Instana, VictoriaMetrics and alerting.

What I build

Select a domain to shift the evidence surface, then inspect a technology node to see where it shows up across production work, research and engineering experiments.

Technology topology

AWS

Infrastructure foundation for compute, networking, data and operational integrations.

Evidence

4

EC2AuroraLambdaIAMCloudWatchFlaskFastAPI direction

Selected node

AWS

production · production

Cloud infrastructure, automation and operational data integrations in M3 platform work.

Projects

1

Case studies

1

Experience

1

Lessons

1

EC2AuroraLambdaIAMCloudWatchFlaskFastAPI directionAurora MySQL

Evidence

• Operational tooling for M3 workflows

• Health monitoring

• Data search and analytics

• Operational configuration and data-update workflows

• Comparator support paths

• Observability integrations

Projects

• M3 OPS

Case studies

• M3 Operations Platform

Experience

• Platform And Reliability Operations

Lessons

• Good observability reduces decision latency, not just dashboard count.

Future direction

• AI Runtime Control Planes

07

Tech stack

An Interactive Skill Graph

Platform engineering sits at the center, with cloud, data, observability, AI and application engineering connected around it.

Platform
Engineering

Selected domain

Platform Engineering

Operating systems, delivery workflows and runtime environments that make other teams faster and safer.

Kubernetes
Docker
Podman
Linux
Jenkins
CI/CD
Nginx
08

Evolution

Capability Evolution

This timeline shows how the engineering focus widened over time from application delivery into data, operations, platform, observability and AI-adjacent systems work.

Capability evolution · conceptual system model

Application

Software delivery

Connected to: Data

Capability path

Select a capability stage to inspect how the engineering focus widened over time.

Activated

Software delivery

Capability evolution

Foundation

Core software and systems grounding that led into enterprise engineering work.

SQLPythonWeb engineering

• Start from system behavior, not tooling fashion.

Capability evolution

Enterprise Data

Pipeline-oriented engineering around SQL Server and enterprise data movement.

SSISSSRSSQL Server

• Data reliability is operational work, not only ETL work.

Capability evolution

Application Modernization

Architecture cleanup and modernization across application stacks.

AngularNode.jsArchitecture

• Simpler systems are easier to evolve under pressure.

Capability evolution

SRE And Operations

Reliability, supportability and operational tool design became central engineering concerns.

ServiceNowOpsgenieGrafanaInstana

• The best systems shorten the path from issue to action.

Capability evolution

Platform Engineering

Runtime, automation and workflow thinking expanded from isolated services to engineering platforms.

KubernetesDockerCI/CDAWS

• Platforms succeed when they remove repeated cognitive load.

Capability evolution

Data Platform

Distributed data movement and performance engineering became a larger part of the system picture.

DatabricksSparkDelta LakeMSSQL

• Data volume changes architecture choices very quickly.

Capability evolution

MLOps And AI Infrastructure

Practical exploration of retrieval systems, vector search and agent tooling as infrastructure problems.

QdrantOllamaLangflowMCP

• AI systems need the same operational rigor as any other platform component.

09

Interactive resume

A Searchable Resume Layer

The resume is embedded into the portfolio instead of hidden behind a stale PDF. The dedicated route stays factual and pulls from the same content model as the rest of the site.

Resume summary

Rishabh Gupta

10+ years of engineering experience across platform, cloud, data and operational systems.

Experience domains

11

Case studies

8

Resume policy

• No unsupported employers, titles, dates, metrics or certifications have been invented.

• Experimental work is separated from production-oriented experience.

• The route is paired with a downloadable static PDF built from the verified resume content.

10

Contact

Open A Conversation

Platform Engineering, SRE, data platforms, AI infrastructure and architecture conversations are all in scope. The fastest paths are direct email, LinkedIn and the resume route.

Primary contact paths

Open to senior engineering, platform, data and AI infrastructure conversations.

Platform EngineeringSREData PlatformsAI InfrastructureArchitecture

Gurugram, India

portfolio shell
$ help
available: help, about, experience, projects, skills, architecture, lab, stack, resume, contact, clear
$

Email draft

Start the conversation

This opens your mail client with a prefilled draft to em.rishabh@gmail.com. Use it for role discussions, architecture conversations, platform work or collaboration inquiries.